|
|
| |
|
Community For Better Health Care
|
|
|
Voices of Medicine
Current
Issue: (previous
issue) (past issue)
|
A Review of Local and Regional Medical Journals
|
|
SONOMA
MEDICINE, the Magazine of the Sonoma County Medical Association, Winter
2009
Autism:
"Let's wait and see" is not an option! By Cathryn Ross, MD
Autistic
spectrum disorders are common (1:150), chronic, biologically based
neurodevelopmental disorders that are highly heritable. Recognition of
early behavioral signs of autistic spectrum disorders (ASD) by
physicians, followed by immediate referral to early intervention
programs, benefits autistic children, their families, their future
schools and society. The old "wait and see" approach is no
longer an option!
The
cause of autism is being actively researched but remains elusive
because so many factors are involved. Several genes have been
identified that probably have to occur in multiples in the same person.
Researchers also believe that some environmental stressors may enhance
the penetrance of mutations conferring susceptibility to autism. The
immune system may be involved as well, because many cases of autism
involve other organ systems and not just the brain; reduced levels of
immunoglobulin in children with autism correlates with behavioral
symptoms. There is also often increased prevalence of maternal
autoantibodies against the fetal brain in autism.
The
American Academy of Pediatrics recommends surveillance for ASD at all
well-child visits and formal screening of all children with a
standardized test at 18- and 24-month visits, and whenever concern is
raised. An ASD toolkit from the pediatric academy contains screening
tools and fact sheets (for both physicians and parents) that address
major issues associated with ASDs.
Diagnosing
ASD is challenging because there are no objective laboratory tests or
pathognomonic clinical signs. The physician must rely on subjective
guidelines provided by the latest edition of the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV-TR) and use informed
clinical judgment, which requires training, supervision and feedback
from experts, as well as experience with many children of different
functioning levels and ages. Compounding the challenge is the
variability in the expression of the three core features of ASD:
ASDs
include three subtypes: autistic disorder (AD), Asperger syndrome, and
pervasive developmental disorder—not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS), a
threshold term used when a child meets some but not all criteria
necessary for a diagnosis of either AD or Asperger syndrome. Since this
article focuses on ASDs before 2 years old and the average age for
diagnosing Asperger syndrome is 8-11 years old, Asperger will not be
discussed. When the word autism or ASD is used in this article,
it represents both AD and its milder form, PDD-NOS . . .
The
earlier the ASD diagnosis is made, the better the outcome; and yet many
of the criteria address developmental skills that are not applicable to
children younger than 2 years developmental age. Therefore, many
severely autistic children may not meet full criteria. For example, the
criteria "failure to form age-appropriate peer
relationships," "stereotypic or repetitive use of
language" or "impairment in initiating or sustaining a
conversation with others" is not relevant to a 2-year-old who may
be preverbal. Also many children who are later diagnosed with ASD don't
develop ritualistic behaviors or a need for routines until after 3
years of age. Taking these issues under consideration, some researchers
have suggested applying only four of the possible twelve DSM-IV-TR
criteria for children under 3 years of age:
-
Lack
of spontaneous seeking to share enjoyment, interests, or achievements
with other people (e.g., lack of showing, bringing, or pointing out
objects of interest)
-
Lack
of social and emotional reciprocity
-
Marked
impairment in the use of multiple nonverbal behaviors, such as
eye-to-eye gaze, facial expression, body postures, and gestures to
regulate social interaction
-
Delay
in or total lack of the development of spoken language (not accompanied
by an attempt to compensate through alternative modes of communication
such as gesture or mime)
The
researchers propose that if all four of the above criteria are
met, then a provisional diagnosis of autism should be made. After the
third birthday, the child should be reevaluated using the full DSM IV-TR
criteria. . .
Read
the entire article: http://scma.org/magazine/articles/?articleid=314.
Dr. Ross is a
developmental-behavioral pediatrician in private practice in Santa
Rosa.
VOM Is Where Doctors' Thinking is Crystallized
into Writing.
subscribe
|
Previous
Issue: (current
issue) (past issue)
|
A Review of Local and Regional Medical Journals and
Articles
|
|
Psychiatry: The Shame of Medicine: The Case of
Alan Turing
Posted By Thomas Szasz, Prof of
Psychiatry, SUNY - The
FREEMAN, May 2009, Vol. 59/Issue 4
Alan Mathison Turing (1912-1954) was
one of the legendary geniuses of the twentieth century. The only child
of a middle-class English family, the Cambridge-educated Turing played
a crucial role in breaking the German Enigma code during World War II,
an achievement often credited with saving Britain from defeat in the
dark days of 1941. Because of the secrecy surrounding the British
code-breaking effort, for a long time only a few colleagues and
high-ranking politicians were aware of Turing's towering contribution
to science and the war effort.
Turing was a mathematician,
cryptographer, and pioneering computer scientist. He was good-looking,
athletic, eccentric, and openly homosexual. In 1935, backed by John
Maynard Keynes, Turing was elected a Fellow of King's College, a
remarkable achievement for so young a man. In 1936 he published a paper
that immediately became a classic in mathematics and earned him an
invitation from John von Neumann to continue his studies at Princeton
University. In 1938, having been awarded a Ph.D. in mathematics, Turing
returned to Cambridge and was soon working at Bletchley Park, the
famous British code-breaking "factory." When the war ended,
Turing moved to Manchester where the university created a special
readership in the theory of computing for him . . .
Fatal Treatment for a Fictitious
Disease
On June 8, 1954, Turing was found
dead by his housekeeper, a partly eaten apple laced with cyanide next
to his bed. At the inquest, the coroner ruled his death a suicide.
Neither his homosexuality nor his psychiatric treatment was mentioned.
The coroner said, "I am forced to the conclusion that this was a
deliberate act. In a man of this type, one never knows what his mental
processes are going to do next." The verdict was "suicide
while the balance of his mind was disturbed." Even in death,
psychiatry and the state stigmatized Turing as mad. The posthumous
diagnosis of suicide as mental illness is the ritual degradation
ceremony of our therapeutic age, much as the posthumous burning of the
heretic's corpse was the ritual degradation ceremony of an earlier
theological age.
No one in Turing's circle, himself
included, was able or willing to transcend the psychiatric zeitgeist:
Homoerotic behavior and self-determined death are self-evident symptoms
of mental illness, it argues, requiring and justifying coercive
medical-psychiatric treatment. Turing's psychiatrist, Dr. Frank M.
Greenbaum, vehemently rejected the coroner's diagnosis, though not by
contesting the claims that engaging in homosexual conduct and
self-killing are evidence of diseases curable by doctors. "There
is not the slightest doubt to me that Alan died by an accident,"
declared Greenbaum.
In 1967 the UK decriminalized
homosexuality. Overnight it ceased to be a disease in England but not
the United States, where for six more years it remained both a crime
and a "treatable disease."
Turing's biographer, Andrew Hodges,
notes that Turing did not consider his homosexuality a disease, a
crime, or a shameful condition. He suggests that Turing opted for
medical treatment rather than a brief period of imprisonment because he
feared that a criminal conviction would be fatal for his career.
Countless of Turing's gay contemporaries at Cambridge and in London
- Wittgenstein, Keynes, Lytton Strachey, many of the Apostles and
Bloomsburys - sensibly stayed away from psychiatrists. Many famous
people - Gandhi, Russell, and Nehru - spent time in prison, though, and
went on to do memorable work. This is not true for people imprisoned in
mental hospitals. After the psychiatric degraders finish their job, the
"patient" is dead - if not biologically then socially. . .
The original function of psychiatry
- which is approximately 300 years old - was penological: The
psychiatrist stigmatized persons as "mad," deprived them of
liberty, and assaulted them with chemical and physical
interventions. A little more than 100 years ago individuals began to
seek psychiatric help for their own problems. As a result, many people
who entrusted themselves to the care of psychiatrists became entrapped
in the machinery of punitive mad-doctoring, dramatically portrayed in
Ken Kesey's best-selling novel, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's
Nest, and the film based
on it. The recent film Changeling presents a real-life example.
So does Alan Turing's psychiatric
undoing.
Psychiatry: Trap, Not Treatment
The identification of psychiatry
with medical healing and humane helpfulness is factually false and
morally deceptive, concealing an existential trap with untold-of
potentialities for injury and death for the entrapped. More
successfully than ever, the modern "biological" psychiatrist
misrepresents his profession as based on biological science and medical
discovery, while more than ever it is based on pseudoscience and
therapeutic deception. . .
. . . organized psychiatry
intensifies the celebration of its founding quack, Benjamin Rush
(1746–1813). Declared Rush, "I have selected those two symptoms
[murder and theft] of this disease [crime] (for they are not vices)
from its other morbid effects, in order to rescue persons affected with
them from the arm of the law, and render them the subjects of the kind
and lenient hand of medicine." What did Rush mean when he spoke of
medical kindness and lenience? Lamenting the "excess of the
passion for liberty inflamed by the successful issue of the
[Revolutionary] war," he explained, "Were we to live our
lives over again and engage in the same benevolent enterprise, our
means should not be reasoning but bleeding, purging, low diet, and the
tranquilizing chair." Psychiatry - glorifying the use of coercion
as cure - is the shame of medicine.
Article printed from The Freeman |
Ideas On Liberty: www.thefreemanonline.org/
URL to article: www.thefreemanonline.org/columns/the-therapeutic-state/the-shame-of-medicine-the-case-of-alan-turing/
VOM Is Where Doctors' Thinking is Crystallized
into Writing.
|
Past
Issue: (current
issue) (previous
issue)
|
A Review of Local and Regional Medical Journals
|
|
The True Costs of
EMRs, By Kenneth Prosser
III, MD Sonoma Medicine, Spring 2009
The practice of medicine has
long enjoyed a successful relationship with advances in scientific
technology. Since beginning my medical career in 1984, for example, I
have seen the advent of MRIs, development of laparoscopic surgical
procedures, two to three times as many new drugs and immunizations, and
the initiation and completion of the human genome project. I have also
witnessed the rise of the personal computer.
Though computers have
been used in medicine for several decades, the use of the electronic
health record (EHR) only began seriously in the United States about
five years ago, when the Bush administration created the Office of the
National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Currently more
than 300 EHR and electronic medical record (EMR) products are
available, though only about two dozen are commonly used. (Just to
clarify the nomenclature, EMR and EHR are currently used synonymously,
but technically an EMR is a type of EHR. I will use EMR to discuss my
own experiences with electronic records.) . . .
EMR usage in Sonoma
County has expanded rapidly over the past few years. The larger
hospitals as well as many private practices and clinics have undergone
the transition to electronic records. My former group, Primary Care
Associates, began phasing into an EMR system in early 2005 and went
fully "live" by that September. Since our group consisted of
both family medicine and pediatrics practices, we had to adopt a system
that was not ideal for either but did attempt to meet everyone's needs.
The actual decision to
go electronic was not met with equal enthusiasm by all in our group.
The initial capital outlay and the ongoing costs in equipment support
and licensing fees were enormous. Everyone understood, however, that
the days of paper charts would end sooner than later, so we decided to
move forward. . .
After the initial shock of
transferring to EMRs and completing the initial training and practice,
we had high hopes that our lives would eventually become much easier.
Looking back to the list of benefits, we were successful with some but
not others. For record accessibility, improved patient care, better
communication, more efficient billing and reduced overhead, the EMR
system definitely delivered on its promise. Many people in the office
could look at the same record at different locations simultaneously
(though only one person could enter information at a time).
Our patient care
benefited from this increased access to information, which also
produced more rapid lab results and better pharmacy interfacing.
Patients with diabetes and other chronic diseases benefited through
disease-management modules and tabular trends in labs and vitals.
Patient referrals and insurance authorizations were processed much more
efficiently, and copies of pertinent information required by schools,
such as immunization records, could be faxed electronically. I
particularly liked the positive impact on prescribing medications. One
click and my prescription transmitted directly to the pharmacist's
computer. . .
Despite the noted benefits to
our patients, insurance companies and specialist referrals, the EMR
significantly increased our workload, even with the advantages brought
by improved intraoffice communication, lab and pharmacy interfaces,
chart access, and legibility. Our physicians spent one or two hours
more in charting throughout and at the end of the day. EMRs bring a
large degree of efficiency, but one can only type and click so fast.
Nurses and medical assistants also felt the increased workload in
charting time. . .
An EMR, to be sure, is
a big plus for medicine. Many people have benefited, but at whose cost?
Speaking for myself, the cost in time, stress, reduced quality and
satisfaction in my work has made me feel a bit worse. Unfortunately
there is no going back. Computers are figuring more and more
prominently in everyone's daily life.
A complete EMR is an
impressive and beneficial tool. Furthermore, future reimbursement from
Medicare and Medicaid will be tied to whether or not a provider is
using an EMR. This is good news for those just now adopting, and there
will apparently be some benefits for early adopters as well.
Unfortunately, in our group's case, the initial capital outlay came
straight out of our pockets, and we were unable to stay in business
long enough to realize any payback from our investment.
www.scma.org/magazine/articles/?articleid=398
Dr. Prosser is a Santa Rosa pediatrician in
private practice.
VOM Is Where Doctors' Thinking is Crystallized
into Writing.
top
|
|
For other issues, please visit our archives. We
invite you to sign up for this
biweekly newsletter.
|
|
|